
BMW X7
From OMR 62,000
A complete comparison of the BMW X7 VS GMC Yukon — specs, prices, pros and cons, and live used listings across Oman.

From OMR 62,000

From OMR 28,000
| #1 BMW X7#1 | #2 GMC Yukon#2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price Comparison | ||
| Starting at | 62,000 OMR | 28,000 OMR |
| Engine & Power | ||
| Engine | 4,400 cc · 8 cyl | 5,300 cc · 8 cyl |
| Horsepower (bhp) | 530 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque (Nm) | 750 Nm | 520 Nm |
| Acceleration 0-100 Km/h (sec) | 4.7 s | 7.3 s |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | 250 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Fuel Economy (L/100 Km) | 11.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 91 L |
| Gears | 8 | 10 |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Drive Type | All Wheel Drive | All Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Measurements | ||
| L×W×H | 5.2 m × 2 m × 1.8 m | 5.3 m × 2.1 m × 1.9 m |
| Wheelbase (meters) | 3.1 m | 3.1 m |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2,320 kg | 2,575 kg |
| Trunk Capacity (liters) | 326 L | 722 L |
| Overview | ||
| Body Style | SUV Crossover | SUV Crossover |
| Seating Capacity | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Features | ||
| Key features | ABS Anti-Lock Brake SystemAlloy RimsAUX InputBluetoothCD PlayerClimate ControlLeather SeatsMP3 SupportParking SensorsPower SteeringPower WindowsRadioRear CameraSecurity System | ABS Anti-Lock Brake SystemAlloy RimsAUX InputBluetoothClimate ControlElectric SunroofFog LightsKeyless EntryLeather SeatsMoonroofMP3 SupportPanoramic Glass RoofParking SensorsPower LocksPower MirrorsPower SteeringPower WindowsPush Button StartRear CameraSecurity SystemUSB Port |
The BMW X7 wins for its powerful 530 hp engine, achieving 0-100 km/h in just 4.7 seconds, offering a truly dynamic and luxurious driving experience.
The GMC Yukon is the undisputed champion here, with a starting price of 28,000 OMR, making it significantly more accessible than the X7.
With a massive 722 L trunk capacity, the GMC Yukon easily accommodates large families and all their gear, far surpassing the X7's cargo space.
The BMW X7 surprisingly offers better fuel economy at 11.4 L/100km, making it the more efficient choice for long-term running costs despite its performance.